|
Maryland newspapers and the Dred Scott Decision
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
St. Mary's Beacon, 15 January 1857 (MSA SC 4360, M 1022)
"The Washington correspondent of the New York Herald states that the United
States Supreme Court have come to a decision upon the important questions
presented in the case of Dred Scott recently argued before the tribunal."
|
|
|
|
The
Daily Baltimore Republican, 7 March 1857 (MSA SC 2894, M 2043-02)
"Power to acquire territory carries power to govern it."
|
|
|
|
The
Baltimore Sun, 7 March 1857 (Maryland State Law Library microfilm)
"The opinion...was listened to with profound interest, and
will be everywhere respected for its wisdom, and acquiesced in as the decision
of the constitutional tribunal."
|
|
|
|
The
Baltimore Sun, 9 March 1857 (Maryland State Law Library microfilm)
"Judge McLean delivered his views in the Dred Scott case to-day..."
|
|
|
|
The
Baltimore Sun, 9 March 1857 (Maryland State Law Library microfilm)
"The decision, we are glad to say, seems to be welcomed in
most quarters."
|
|
|
|
The
Baltimore Sun, 9 March 1857 (Maryland State Law Library microfilm)
"Already we find that the slavery agitators at the North feel
it [the Dred Scott decision] to be their death-blow."
|
|
|
|
The
Daily Baltimore Republican, 9 March 1857 (MSA SC 2894, M 2043-2)
"The delivery of the this opinion...whether as a decision of
the Supreme Court, or for the constitutional arguments on which it stands,
will exert the most powerful and salutary influence throughout the United
States."
|
|
|
|
The
Baltimore Sun, 10 March 1857 (Maryland State Law Library microfilm)
"...The Chief-Justice said, from the best consideration, we
have come to the conclusion that the African race who came to this country,
whether free or slave, were not intended to be included in the constitution
for the enjoyment of any personal rights or benefits; and the two provisions
which point to them treat them as property..."
|
|
|
|
The
Baltimore Sun, 10 March 1857 (Maryland State Law Library microfilm)
"The opinions will be read with interest, and therefore, in
view of the importance of the questions decided and thus set at rest, we
willingly give up so much space to their insertion."
|
|
|
|
The
Easton Star, 10 March 1857 (MSA SC 3596, M 11316)
"In short, the court sustains the Democratic doctrine throughout..."
|
|
|
|
The
Baltimore Sun, 11 March 1857 (Maryland State Law Library microfilm)
"...we can foresee that this decision will create, everywhere,
a profound sensation."
|
|
|
|
The
Baltimore Sun, 11 March 1857 (Maryland State Law Library microfilm)
"Dissenting Opinions of Judges McLean and Curtis: ...It
had never been held necessary that to constitute a citizen a man should
have the qualification of an elector."
|
|
|
|
The
Annapolis Gazette, 12 March 1857 (MSA SC 3322, M 8825)
"The Supreme Court has given a decision in this case, of great
interest to all sections of our Union, and one that will go very far towards
allaying sectional excitement on the subject of slavery."
|
|
|
|
The
Baltimore County Advocate, 14 March 1857 (MSA SC 2932, M 3337)
"The decision of the Supreme Court of the United States, in
the case of Dred Scott, is of the utmost importance, not only at the present
time, but for generations to come."
|
|
|
|
The
Easton Gazette, 14 March 1857 (MSA SC 2940, M 11033)
"We hope now that the agitation of the slavery question may
be set at rest by this decision. It is, we have no doubt, the death knell
of the democratic party..."
|
|
|
|
The
Kent News, 14 March 1857 (MSA SC 2901, M 2355)
"The moral of the opinion is that the United States government
cannot exercise any power over persons and property in the territories
that they cannot do in the States."
|
|
|
|
The
Baltimore Sun, 17 March 1857 (Maryland State Law Library microfilm)
"'Dred Scott' has already got into the pulpit, and for the
future will be a great hobby, no doubt, for many of our clergymen who love
to mingle in politics to the detriment of religion."
|
|
|
|
The
Montgomery County Sentinel, 19 March 1857 (MSA SC 2813, M 475-02)
"The opinion of the Supreme Court...decides that...Negroes,
whether slaves or free--that is, men of the African race--are not citizens
of the United States by the Constitution."
|
|
|
|
The
Easton Gazette, 21 March 1857 (MSA SC 2940, M 11033)
"The late decision in the case of Dred Scott has very much
displeased the people of that fanatical State [Massachusetts]..."
|
|
|
|
The
Annapolis Gazette, 26 March 1857 (MSA SC 3322, M 8825)
"Had Southern disagreement ventured, as now does Northern disappointment,
to attack the decision or to evade its authority, the indignant storm of
denunciation would have been borne on every Northern breeze, and Southern
nullification and Southern insurrection given the watchword to a new sectional
crusade more bitter and unrelenting than any that had preceded it."
|
|
|
|
The
Montgomery County Sentinel, 27 March 1857 (MSA SC 2813, M 475-02)
"...It is evident that Scott's name has been used by a class
of slavery agitators for political effect."
|
|
|
|
The
Baltimore Sun, 30 March 1857 (Maryland State Law Library microfilm)
"A confident expectation is entertained here that the mission
of Mr. Walker and Mr. Stanton to Kansas will prevent any further difficulty
in Kansas..."
|
|
|
|
The
St. Mary's Beacon, 16 April 1857 (MSA SC 4360, M 1022)
"Democratic canvassers in the town of Gloucester (R.I.) struck
the names of colored voters in that town from the lists before the election
Wednesday, alleging that they were justified in this action by the decision
in the case of Dred Scott."
|
|
|
|
The
St. Mary's Beacon, 29 April 1858 (MSA SC 4360, M 1022)
"We, therefore, rejoice to find that the Hon. Rev. Johnson
(who was a counsel in case) has so effectually exposed the injustice of
the criticisms of the Court's action in the case to which we refer, as
well as the sweeping impropriety of the personalities to which the maligners
of the highest legal tribunal in the land, in and out of Congress, see
fit to resort, in the premises." The argument of Reverdy Johnson then follows.
|
|
|
|
The
St. Mary's Beacon, 2 December 1858 (MSA SC 4360, M 1022)
This article discusses misrepresentations and interpretations
of the Dred Scott Decision by politicians, including Jefferson Davis, and
prints a portion of the actual decision.
|
|
|
|
The
St. Mary's Beacon, 26 May 1859 (MSA SC 4360, M 1022)
"The Court decided that there is no difference between property
in a slave and any other property."
|