Andor D. Skotnes, The Black Freedom Movement and the Worker's Movement in Baltimore, 1930-1939, Rutger's PhD, 1991,
Image No: 443
   Enlarge and print image (64K)            << PREVIOUS   NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


 

Andor D. Skotnes, The Black Freedom Movement and the Worker's Movement in Baltimore, 1930-1939, Rutger's PhD, 1991,
Image No: 443
   Enlarge and print image (64K)            << PREVIOUS   NEXT >>
443 class activity was picking up in Baltimore. Expectations (and apprehension), especially in the press and in governmental circles, seemed to picked up even more because of the national strike wave and the growing sit-down mania. In late February, overzealous state legislators introduced a bill in the Maryland Assembly to outlaw sit-down strikes, although there had been virtually no need for it as yet in the state. When seventy-five women workers stopped work, and twenty-five of them sat down two weeks later at the Roberts Dress Company, the press headlined that "City's First Strike Of This Type Starts In South Paca Street Factory."28 This headline was, of course, inaccurate, because at least one sit-down had occurred on a ship in Baltimore harbor. Moreover, the Roberts sit-down was a mild affair when compared to the struggles in Flint - or in the port. The strike was called on the orders of the ILGWU national office in New York to support the union's efforts in organizing two Roberts shops in that state and to oppose moving work out of Baltimore to nonunion shops. The Baltimore plant manager offered the strikers sandwiches, cake, and coffee; the police were polite and unobtrusive; and, after a week, the number of sit-downers was reduced to ten to save the union money in caring for them. After two weeks, the union announced a settlement, and the remaining workers in the building emerged victorious: another advance was made in Baltimore's most unionized industrial sector. A more important advance in garments, however, came more quietly. In February, the Amalgamated Clothing Workers, with a membership variously estimated at 7,000 to 10,000 workers, firmly pressed Baltimore men's clothing manufacturers to break the tradition of giving city workers lower raises than those given in Northern cities, and to raise wages the full 12% won shortly before in New York. After a couple of weeks of grumbling and foot-dragging, the Baltimore employers capitulated. They were unwilling to go up against such a formidable foe in the midst of a strike wave. In many ways, this victory was symbolic of the way that the ACW helped build the CIO in the late 1930s: it used its strength quietly