Andor D. Skotnes, The Black Freedom Movement and the Worker's Movement in Baltimore, 1930-1939, Rutger's PhD, 1991,
Image No: 391
   Enlarge and print image (63K)            << PREVIOUS   NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


 

Andor D. Skotnes, The Black Freedom Movement and the Worker's Movement in Baltimore, 1930-1939, Rutger's PhD, 1991,
Image No: 391
   Enlarge and print image (63K)            << PREVIOUS   NEXT >>
391 The Margaret Williams case fit right into the NAACP educational campaign that was initiated with the Donald Murray case against the University of Maryland Law School. In fact, the Williams case fulfilled the promise that this campaign would not deal solely with discrimination on the university level, but would also challenge Jim Crow in the primary and secondary schools. Moreover, the case used the same tactical approach as the Murray case in several ways: in demanding integration because of lack of separate but equal facilities, in filing for a writ of mandamus, and in basing the case on the 14th Amendment. It is also important to note that the case originated in a struggle by the Baltimore County Black community around the high school issue, and that the Williams family was already moving toward legal action before NAACP intervened. Hence, the Baltimore branch moved in as advocate for an existing community movement, while simultaneously drawing from and furthering a national campaign. Furthermore, the Williams case not only combined a national legal strategy with a locally-generated issue, it also indicated the renovated Baltimore branch's view of its responsibilities. Both the case and the community directly affected were outside the formal jurisdiction of the Baltimore branch — that is, outside of the city of Baltimore. In taking the case, the Baltimore branch was clearly acting out of a vision of itself as tribune for the whole of the African American community of Baltimore and the city's hinterlands. Characteristically, the branch used the Williams case as an organizing opportunity to help get the Baltimore County branch of the NAACP on its feet. A similar blending of tensions and imperatives was also evident in the Baltimore branch's biggest litigation-based struggle of the later 1930s: the campaign for equal salaries for Black and white school teachers throughout the state of Maryland. Like the Williams case, this campaign arose out of local demands, but also fit right into the larger national education campaign that began with the Murray suit. Like the Williams case, the equalization of teacher's salaries