Andor D. Skotnes, The Black Freedom Movement and the Worker's Movement in Baltimore, 1930-1939, Rutger's PhD, 1991,
Image No: 379
   Enlarge and print image (57K)            << PREVIOUS   NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


 

Andor D. Skotnes, The Black Freedom Movement and the Worker's Movement in Baltimore, 1930-1939, Rutger's PhD, 1991,
Image No: 379
   Enlarge and print image (57K)            << PREVIOUS   NEXT >>
379 SECTION IV MODERN FOUNDATIONS, LATE-1935 TO 1940 During the period from 1930 to 1933, the emerging social movements in Baltimore were characterized by fluidity, locally-based initiative, and inventive forms of struggle that responded closely and somewhat spontaneously to local resources. In these years, the Black freedom movement and workers movement generally developed along separate paths, and each generated basically non- traditional forms (the City-Wide Young People's Forum, the People's Unemployment League, revolutionary unionism). Radicalism and, to a somewhat lesser degree, youth played key roles in this period (the Forum youth, the PUL- oriented Socialists, the CP) and were much responsible for the experiments with interpenetration between the workers and Black freedom movement that took place (Euel Lee defense, cultural work, the unemployed councils, the PUL). The growth of these newer, non-traditional forms of struggle took place against the background of stagnation in the older, more traditional organizations of both movements (trade unions, especially those affiliated with the AFL, the NAACP, and, initially, the Urban League), although there were important exceptions (the Afro, the Amalgamated Clothing Workers). In the ensuing period, from late-1933 through much of 1935, the trends of the earlier period culminated. One culmination was the growing interracial convergence of radical leaders of the newer, less traditional mass organizations of each of the two movements (the Forum, the PUL) on a broad, radical agenda including peace, economic security, Black freedom, and socialism. However, in the changing historical context, the earlier trends were in transformation in another conflicting direction: growing national movements were pulling the local movements toward divergent nationally-defined courses, as the PUL became part