Andor D. Skotnes, The Black Freedom Movement and the Worker's Movement in Baltimore, 1930-1939, Rutger's PhD, 1991,
Image No: 333
   Enlarge and print image (62K)            << PREVIOUS   NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


 

Andor D. Skotnes, The Black Freedom Movement and the Worker's Movement in Baltimore, 1930-1939, Rutger's PhD, 1991,
Image No: 333
   Enlarge and print image (62K)            << PREVIOUS   NEXT >>
333 anti-lynching legislation, directed nationally by the NAACP in support of the Costigan-Wagner Bill, rapidly became the Forum's predominant concern. In February 1934, the Forum reported collecting signatures on a thousand form letters in support of this bill and mailing these to Maryland senators. Forum activists also visited businesses and prominent individuals to persuade them to write personal letters in support of the bill. In an evident spin-off of this effort, the Forum in March 1934 sent another thousand letters to Maryland Congressmen, calling on them to support Congressman Oscar DePreist's efforts to eradicate Jim Crow from the restaurants in the House and Senate buildings.)°^ Then, on February 21, 1934, Forum president Juanita Jackson and vice president Clarence Mitchell both testified at the hearings on the Costigan-Wagner Bill in Washington, D.C. Juanita Jackson Mitchell later recalled that a delegation from Baltimore went to the hearings, including several whites that the Forum recruited to testify. At that time, she and her compatriots then felt, Mitchell later remarked, that it was especially important to have whites testifying against lynching and encouraged their involvement. Significantly, the whites in the delegation included Rev. Asbury Smith, then acting chair of the Maryland Anti-Lynching Federation, and Socialist Elisabeth Oilman, secretary of the federation. Juanita Jackson Mitchell also later remembered that, on that occasion, the delegation presented an anti-lynching petition with six thousand signatures to the Senate Committee.61 Interestingly, two other Baltimoreans who were not pan of the delegation with Jackson and Mitchell testified before the committee on February 21. One was Maryland Attorney General William Prescott Lane, Jr., who was very well received by the committee despite the fact he could only muster up the most abstract support for federal anti-lynching legislation. The other was Bernard Ades, who was accompanied by national Communist leader James W. Ford. The testimony given by Ades and Ford on the one hand, and by the members of the Baltimore