Andor D. Skotnes, The Black Freedom Movement and the Worker's Movement in Baltimore, 1930-1939, Rutger's PhD, 1991,
Image No: 324
   Enlarge and print image (60K)            << PREVIOUS   NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


 

Andor D. Skotnes, The Black Freedom Movement and the Worker's Movement in Baltimore, 1930-1939, Rutger's PhD, 1991,
Image No: 324
   Enlarge and print image (60K)            << PREVIOUS   NEXT >>
324 the ILD, as we have seen, put a great deal of energy into the ensuing ami-lynching protests, raising some of the most militant demands, prodding the movement to see the system as a whole, not individuals, as the problem, and providing the local movement with national exposure and solidarity. Moreover the CP and ILD were the only largely white groupings to visibly support the Buy Where You Can Work movement in late 1933, albeit with some ambivalence. Given their role in these protests, one might assume that the ILD and the CP were in an even stronger position in the freedom movement at the end of 1933 than in the previous October. However, some problems had arisen. The ILD had come under attack from what might be called center-right forces in the anti- lynching protests (grouped around certain powerful ministers and prominent individuals); the ILD's response was not conciliatory or balanced, but was close to an all-out counter-attack. Moreover, strains had developed between the ILD and the CP and some of the center-left forces of the Black freedom movement, including the Afro and some of the Forum youth. These problems were further complicated by a government offensive against the Baltimore ILD which began in the summer of 1933, and picked up momentum in the fall. Ideologically this offensive took the form, noted above, of a series of pronouncements by officials from Governor Ritchie on down that amounted to little more than sanitized versions of the claims made by Eastern Shore racists and lynchers: the outside agitators of the ILD and the CP were the cause of the white terror. Politically, this offensive was manifested in the report, also noted above, by the Ritchie-appointed judicial committee, headed by Herbert O'Conor, that recommended that the rights of attorneys, especially those from "outside" organizations, to involve themselves in cases be restricted. Judicially, the offensive took the form of an attempt to disbar the ILD's most prominent member, white attorney Bernard Ades. The themes raised in the judicial aspect of the offensive echoed those of the ideological and political aspects.