Andor D. Skotnes, The Black Freedom Movement and the Worker's Movement in Baltimore, 1930-1939, Rutger's PhD, 1991,
Image No: 280
   Enlarge and print image (59K)            << PREVIOUS   NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


 

Andor D. Skotnes, The Black Freedom Movement and the Worker's Movement in Baltimore, 1930-1939, Rutger's PhD, 1991,
Image No: 280
   Enlarge and print image (59K)            << PREVIOUS   NEXT >>
280 Indeed, the Baltimore MWIU and WUC made no secret of the fact that their memberships were partly interchangeable. By the end of 1933, both the MWIU and the WUC in the port had a history of battling relief authorities. As in other port cities, unemployed seamen in Baltimore throughout 1933 still had to rely on private relief facilities. One of the most important of these was a complex of buildings known as the Anchorage, run by the YMCA, where a limited number of destitute seamen could find food and lodging. Conditions at the Anchorage were frequently described as crowded and filthy, often only one insubstantial meal a day was provided, and unpaid work was required from those staying there. Many seamen believed that the officials who ran the Anchorage were corrupt, and that relief funds were diverted by these "grafters" to other uses. And Anchorage officials attempted to prevent all union or political activity on the premises, frequently calling in the police to disrupt meetings. The MWIU and the WUC, naturally, found the Anchorage to be an excellent place for agitation/ In early 1933, the MWIU and the WUC held a public hearing into the funding of the Anchorage. When no Anchorage or YMCA officials showed up at the inquiry, the seamen present selected a committee to go to these officials and demand a full accounting of finances, a change of relief personnel, and an improvement of conditions. The committee was rebuffed, and passed from one official to another, getting no satisfaction. However, the basis and part of the pattern for future action was laid, and lower levels of activity around the Anchorage continued. The Baltimore seamen's movement received both encouragement and a model for their campaign against relief authorities from the seamen's movement in New York. In early 1933, seamen there, led by the New York MWIU, occupied the Jane Street Mission (a seamen's relief center similar to the Anchorage) and took facets of the mission's administration of relief into their own hands. The national MWIU publicized the New York struggle, which came to be know in left-wing