Andor D. Skotnes, The Black Freedom Movement and the Worker's Movement in Baltimore, 1930-1939, Rutger's PhD, 1991,
Image No: 241
   Enlarge and print image (61K)            << PREVIOUS   NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


 

Andor D. Skotnes, The Black Freedom Movement and the Worker's Movement in Baltimore, 1930-1939, Rutger's PhD, 1991,
Image No: 241
   Enlarge and print image (61K)            << PREVIOUS   NEXT >>
241 performances by the Labor Chataqua from Brookwood Labor College early May 1933, by organizing a 10-day Street Carnival in September, and by holding recreational events like picnics. The PUL also made its members aware of existing educational opportunities at such community institutions as the Open Forum and o the Workmen's Circle and encouraged the unemployed to take part. Finally, as PUL chairman Rev. Clarence W. Whitmore put it, the league proposed "to cooperate with other community forces in promoting all constructive measures to restore and safe-guard the economic security, health and general welfare of all the people of the State of Maryland.*1 Because of the fragmented character of the social struggle in Baltimore, action to pursue this goal came a little slower than action in other areas. In mid-April 1933, the PUL sent delegates in mid-April 1933 to the Socialist Party-initiated Continental Congress for Economic Reconstruction; the following July it joined with a number of forces in Maryland to sponsor the spin-off Maryland Convention of the Continental Congress of Farmers and Workers. At the end of October, the PUL became part of the burgeoning anti- lynching movement by passing a resolution demanding punishment for lynchers of George Armwood in Princess Anne and, along with a number of other organizations, sending representatives to protest the lynching directly to Governor Ritchie. By December, PUL was involved in the Maryland Ami-Lynching Federation as an organization, and a PUL leader was vice president of the Federation. In summary, the PUL became, in a very brief period, one of the largest, most ethnically diverse, most active, and, in many ways, most remarkable organizations of the unemployed in the United States. How did this happen in Baltimore, where the tradition of labor struggle was relatively weak and organized labor relatively ineffective; where Jim Crow was so entrenched and the distance between racial- ethnic groups so large? And why was the PUL so organizationally successful, while