Andor D. Skotnes, The Black Freedom Movement and the Worker's Movement in Baltimore, 1930-1939, Rutger's PhD, 1991,
Image No: 233
   Enlarge and print image (60K)            << PREVIOUS   NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


 

Andor D. Skotnes, The Black Freedom Movement and the Worker's Movement in Baltimore, 1930-1939, Rutger's PhD, 1991,
Image No: 233
   Enlarge and print image (60K)            << PREVIOUS   NEXT >>
233 would always have two or three, what he called stool-pigeons ejected from meetings by strong-arm methods while gushing females and presumedly red- blooded men were awe struck at the daring of the prophet. " And Juanita Jackson Mitchell recalled another dimension of the split with Costonie: [Costonie] and my mother matched up, except when he got to fooling around with the girls. The women got him run out of Baltimore. The real downfall of Costonie was when the preachers turned against him, because they had so many complaints about how fast and loose he was with young women—old and young— and the parents were complaining. When Costonie left Baltimore, to the surprise of the Forum leadership, several Forum women went with him. ° There was, however, another, more decisive issue: Costonie disagreed with the direction the movement was taking. He believed that the money being raised for the appeal could be better spent setting up Black businesses. Evidently he had little support for this idea, for even the Opportunity Makers' Club, the organization thai he had created to train young men to take the jobs opened up by boycotts, rebelled and decided to donate its money to the appeal fund. Only Ralph Matthews, playwright and Afro columnist, publicly agreed with Costonie. After Costonie left town, Matthews lashed out at the ingratitude of the "old Baltimoreans" who he felt had allowed Costonie to take all the risks of building the movement, then took it over when it was successful and kicked the Prophet out. But while Matthews was a lone voice, there was at least some truth to what he 4Q wrote. Costonie's nationalistic outlook had coincided with certain traditional aspirations of Baltimore's freedom movement, and was compatible with the inclinations of its most active elements (especially the youth of the Forum) in mid- 1933. By mid-1934, when, in pan large due to his activities, the movement had broadened and was able to draw on a wider range of its traditions, his outlook became less compatible. Moreover, the broadened movement, deeply based in the