Andor D. Skotnes, The Black Freedom Movement and the Worker's Movement in Baltimore, 1930-1939, Rutger's PhD, 1991,
Image No: 135
   Enlarge and print image (60K)            << PREVIOUS   NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


 

Andor D. Skotnes, The Black Freedom Movement and the Worker's Movement in Baltimore, 1930-1939, Rutger's PhD, 1991,
Image No: 135
   Enlarge and print image (60K)            << PREVIOUS   NEXT >>
135 Toward the end of the year, the Afro in frustration engaged in one of its periodic calls to arms, berating the NAACP, the BUL and the Women's Cooperative League for inaction in the face of disaster. Of course, spontaneous struggle continued. As 1930 began, another Black family fought the hostility of its neighbors and attempted to retain its position as the first African American household on a white block. Occasionally the relative calm was decisively broken, as, for example, when at the end of 1930, 2,000 African Americans protested the closing of a bank that held their deposits that and sixty-four were arrested. Spontaneous popular actions were, however, infrequent, usually small and isolated, and of little enduring impact. Although social tension rose as the depression worsened, the demoralization of the existing institutions and protest organizations of Baltimore's working class and racial/ethnic communities left a vacuum. No group was able to step forward from the ranks of the traditional leaderships to organize really serious resistance to the effects of the Depression. Instead, as the next few years would show, new forms for struggle had to be created by new leaderships, forms that were capable of grappling with the enormity of the Depression and that were firmly grounded in local realities. As these new forms appeared and developed, they would eventually stimulate the renewal and transformation of some of older forms, and would enable the social movements of Baltimore to merge with rising national movements and organizations. But this renewal and fusion with national processes did not become the dominant direction in Baltimore until 1935. The interim period, 1930 through 1934, was one characterized by the development of newer, more inventive, more localized organs of popular struggle. And the first of these newer organizational forms to emerge in Baltimore was the local unit of the Communist Party (CP). To refer to the Baltimore CP of 1930 as a new, locally-oriented organization may seem surprising. It was in fact new: it was founded in 1928 and had been little