Andor D. Skotnes, The Black Freedom Movement and the Worker's Movement in Baltimore, 1930-1939, Rutger's PhD, 1991,
Image No: 106
   Enlarge and print image (60K)            << PREVIOUS   NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


 

Andor D. Skotnes, The Black Freedom Movement and the Worker's Movement in Baltimore, 1930-1939, Rutger's PhD, 1991,
Image No: 106
   Enlarge and print image (60K)            << PREVIOUS   NEXT >>
106 are overrepresented in many of the same occupations in transportation as Blacks were: unskilled railroads (17.8% foreign born), road and street laborers (16.7%), longshore (173%), and sailors (23%). Moreover, in communications both Blacks and white immigrants are virtually excluded. The reason for the coincidence of high concentrations of Blacks and white immigrants in these areas, and the near exclusion of both from communications in contrast to the general pattern in Baltimore, is not entirely clear. The explanation may rest with special factors in each case: many seamen were foreign-born because of the international character of the trade; the especially chauvinistic tendencies of the aristocratic railroad workers, who were 95.9% white natives, excluded both immigrants and Blacks from the skilled ranks of this industry; immigrants were excluded from communications because of language problems; Blacks were excluded from communications because of the more systematic segregationism of newer industries (the situation was similar in Baltimore's auto and aircraft industries) plus the fact that so many communications workers were white women. Whatever the explanations, though, it is important to note that there was a greater tendency for white immigrants and Blacks to end up together at the lower levels of employment in transport jobs than in other areas of Baltimore's economy. Among transport workers, longshoremen (69.0% Black, 17.7% foreign-born white) bear special mention for several reasons. First, while longshoremen were casual workers, their work took a good deal of experience and dexterity, and they received reasonably high pay compared to other "unskilled" categories. Second, longshore work had been a rung for groups of white immigrant men, sometimes ex- seamen, who were moving up the skill ladder; among whites, Germans predominated in the early 20th century and were replaced largely with Poles by 1930. Third, large numbers of Blacks were longshoremen in 1930 because of a protracted struggle from the era of the Civil War to retain employment on the