Andor D. Skotnes, The Black Freedom Movement and the Worker's Movement in Baltimore, 1930-1939, Rutger's PhD, 1991,
Image No: 48
   Enlarge and print image (61K)            << PREVIOUS   NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


 

Andor D. Skotnes, The Black Freedom Movement and the Worker's Movement in Baltimore, 1930-1939, Rutger's PhD, 1991,
Image No: 48
   Enlarge and print image (61K)            << PREVIOUS   NEXT >>
48 live uptown; Eastern European Jews were, in their vast majority, working class and still largely lived downtown. In fact, there was significant social, cultural, and geographic distance between the two groupings, and most of the members of each group had little to do with the other on the level of daily life.14 The relations between Eastern European and German Jews in Baltimore were both antagonistic and symbiotic. For example, German Jews created philanthropic institutions that were primarily designed to aid the poorer and more recently arrived Eastern European Jewish community, thereby strengthening the common Jewish identity. This philanthropy, however, was often extremely paternalistic and sometimes openly based on embarrassment over the supposedly less civilized behavior of Eastern Europeans. Consequently, the German Jewish philanthropy that often materially aided Eastern European Jews came at a price, and the resulting resentment reinforced a particularly Eastern European Jewish identity and sense of resistance. The fact that many Eastern European Jews labored for clothing firms owned by German Jews was likewise a two-edged sword. On the one hand, trade union struggle in the garment industry often took on the complexion of class war within the Baltimore Jewish community. On the other, employment in Jewish-owned firms meant that Orthodox Jews could better pursue their religious practices, and wealth from garment production was spread throughout the Jewish community (albeit in an unequal manner). 5 The result of the internal social complexity of the Baltimore Jewish community was an extremely rich, varied system of ethnic culture that combined institutions that sought to unify the community (such as the Jewish Court of Justice , the second one established in the U.S.; the aforementioned philanthropies), with webs of localized institutions representing distinct sections of the community (the Reform temples, the Orthodox shules, the landsmanshaftn). Additionally, drawing on Jewish cultural traditions of resistance, the Baltimore community had a socially active wing that was expressed both in working class-based radicalism (labor