Andor D. Skotnes, The Black Freedom Movement and the Worker's Movement in Baltimore, 1930-1939, Rutger's PhD, 1991,
Image No: 42
   Enlarge and print image (61K)            << PREVIOUS   NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


 

Andor D. Skotnes, The Black Freedom Movement and the Worker's Movement in Baltimore, 1930-1939, Rutger's PhD, 1991,
Image No: 42
   Enlarge and print image (61K)            << PREVIOUS   NEXT >>
42 convergence in proportions of Black population had occurred among the North Atlantic ports, it is important to emphasize that only in Baltimore was the Black community really established over generations; in New York and Philadelphia especially, large portions of the Black population were new arrivals. Table 3-1 also disputes the notion that Baltimore was essentially the same as Southern cities in having tiny European ethnic populations. Over 29% of Baltimore's population was either European immigrant or first-generation natl.e- born. While this proportion is significantly less that the 50% plus proportions of Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, and Detroit, and while it pales compared to the 70% plus levels in New York and Boston, it is nonetheless from three to five times greater than most Southern cities listed. Finally, Table 3-1 does indicate one ethnic-demographic similarity between Baltimore and the cities of the South. The final column of the table lists the proportions of the selected cities population comprised by ethnic minorities — white or non-white. For the Southern cities listed and for Baltimore, that proportion fell between the 30th and 40th percentile; for the Northern cities it ranged from about 60% to about 80%. Put differently, this can be read to indicate that "native" whites demographically dominated in Baltimore and the urban South to similar degrees, while they were in the minority in the urban North. This similarity between Baltimore and the South disguises a crucial difference, however. Baltimore always had significantly higher rates of European immigration than the South, and far larger portions of its "native" whites had foreign roots two or three generations back. Therefore, the amalgamated native-white grouping in Baltimore, was far more cosmopolitan (and far less Southern) in its heritage and culture. Baltimore's "native" whites were different from those of, say, Richmond or Atlanta. Like other major centers of immigration, Baltimore's European ethnic population was made up of a plethora of nationalities. Table 3-2 indicates both the diversity of European ethnicities in this city and their relative proportions. This