PREVIOUS | NEXT | NEW SEARCH |
The Capital and the Bay: Narratives of Washington and the Chesapeake Bay Region, ca. 1600-1925
The Calvert parers, Vol. IIIAPPENDIX B.
Page 57 { page image }
ADDITIONAL NOTES FROM REV. THOMAS HUGHES, S. J.
Variations noted in the Dalrymple Balt. pamphlet:--Relatio . . . . Maryl. Corrections ex Anglia Histor. IV., pp. 413--440.
(N. B.--I merely ran over such Notes in the pamphlet as suggested a verification. I did not compare texts, word by word.)
As to the document itself, it is evidently a copy. The writing is very clear, like copperplate, but with old turns and abbreviations. The handwriting and the corrosive ink used are the same as those of Anglia Histor. III. pp. 173--236. (See Md. Incunabula, supra, p. 2, n. 1.) The lines drawn in the document,--the Relatio itself,--marking the parts to be omitted, and even single sentences, correspond to what has been omitted in the other doc't. Nothing else in this copy of Relatio to determine its authorship or exact date.
[Note 1: 1 The reference is to Fund Publication, No. 7.]
[Note 2: 2 Guavar probably intended.]
Page 58 { page image }
(Cf. Balt. pamphlet, p. 124.1) On the Declaratio.
[Note 1: 1 The reference is to Fund Publication, No. 7.]
The copy of the Declaratio is in a free, easy hand, altogether different from that of the Relatio.
Corrections ex Anglia Histor. IV, pp. 877--880:--
The explicit, p. 53 (Bait. pampl.1), and the two little paragraphs, p. 43, are not of course in the text.
Information about SGML version of this document.
PREVIOUS | NEXT | NEW SEARCH |