Dr. James W. Stone. Report of the Trial of
Professor John W. Webster ...
, 1850
,
Image No: 269
   Enlarge and print image (54K)           << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


 

Dr. James W. Stone. Report of the Trial of
Professor John W. Webster ...
, 1850
,
Image No: 269
   Enlarge and print image (54K)           << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
260 Now, if you will reckon, you will see that that is six per cent., which would carry it over to April 25th, 1850. Do you think that Dr. Webster would have paid.a year's interest, when only seven or eight months' was due ? But perhaps you will say that he did not do it, and that this amount is made up from other items -from the 8125 and the 817.56, to which I have already alluded, which was a receipt of money which Dr. Webster had paid Dr. Parkman. But he evi- dently did do it by casting this year's interest, as we show by his own figures. Now, to say that you are to cast six per cent. on all the above items is palpably wrong, because he had different times for which to compute the interest on the several items. The computa- tion is made of the six per cent. on 8456.27, and it brought him 8483.64. Now he says, "9th, due Dr. Parkman 8483.64, by his account. Desired him to wait till Friday, 23d. Friday, one and a half, paid. He to clear mortgage," and the other matters, which are not material. You will have the paper with you, and you will see for yourselves. Here is another piece of paper. Here is found in his wallet a little piece of paper bearing the figures 8483.64, and another little piece which had reference to something else-°° Jug-keys-tin box- solder!" I do not care to go into that. Why is this memorandum of 8483.64 put into his pocket and carried about ? It is evident that it is all a falsehood. But it is a fiction which concerns his reputation -which concerns everything near to him-that he should be con- sistent in ; and it would not do for him to change it. Having com- mitted himself to Parkman and Blake, he must adhere to his state- ment to them. Lest he should omit, by some slip of the tongue, giv- ing the right amount, he carefully puts down 8483.64, and puts it into his wallet ; and carries this, a double version of the affair, omit- ting two interviews, making a rate of interest which did not exist ! And then, Gentlemen, what is more important than all, there is found, in the way in which you have already been apprized, through the let- ter written to his daughter, °' Tell mamma not to open the little bun- dle which I gave her the other day, but to keep it," -a bundle that turns out to be these two notes. And yet, from beginning to end, he represents Dr. Parkman as taking that money from him, turning sud- denly round, and dashing his pen through the signature. He says not a. word about two notes, expressly confining his statement to one piece of paper. And yet, here are found in his possession two notes, bearing those marks, which, if made by Dr. Parkman, must have re- quired those dashes to have been made, as it is proved neither one of them was made by a pen. That is placed beyond question, by the uncontradicted testimony of both the experts,-Mr. Gould and Mr. Smith. We can show you how it might have been done. You will have an opportunity to see how it might have been done, by a peculiar instrument found on his premises. But, at all events, he has falsified; and it is not the most serious thing about which he has falsified. AFTERNOON. Mr. Clifford resumed his argument, and continued as follows: -1 hope, Gentlemen of the Jury, I shall very soon relieve you and myself from the examination of this painful case. I am aware I have