Dr. James W. Stone. Report of the Trial of
Professor John W. Webster ...
, 1850
,
Image No: 252
   Enlarge and print image (55K)           << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


 

Dr. James W. Stone. Report of the Trial of
Professor John W. Webster ...
, 1850
,
Image No: 252
   Enlarge and print image (55K)           << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
243 building in some incomprehensible way, and hence the door was found unbolted in the morning. You remember how impressive the Counsel was about that unknown person, who might thus and then have effected his entrance into the building. This, of course, is utterly subversive of the other theory, if it has anv foundation in the proof. But I think there is another suggestion worthy of your attention. On that Friday night after one o'clock in the morning, and up to one the next day, who testifies of the whcreabout of Dr. Webster? Who, beside him had a key to that door, except Dr. Leigh? The facility with which Dr. Webster flitted between the Medical College and Cambridge has been made apparent to you by the testimony of his own witnesses. I, too, think the unbolted door had some connection with these remains, but not that it bears upon any other person than the prisoner. I cannot imagine that there was some murderer out- side who carries these remains there, because suspicion had begun to breathe upon Dr. Webster. That would imply that this body had been put there at a very late period in the week. But, in point of fact, Gentlemen, until these remains were found on the premises, and until that startling discovery was communicated to the police, there was no evidence of a general suspicion against the prisoner- none whatever, until Friday, the day of his arrest. Then, undoubtedly, it was a matter of remark. There is no doubt but that, with regard to the College, public sentiment had been decid- ed before that date. But, let me say that the public are not prompt to entertain an unfounded charge, of a great crime, against a man who is set so far beyond the reach of suspicion as to make it require proof upon proof to connect him with the transaction. But what foundation is there for any such theory as this? There has appeared nothing yet, nothing whatever, to point at, or implicate, any such third person. And upon what are you to try this cause. Gentlemen? "° Hearken to your evidence," was the admonition with which you commenced your patient and protracted labors in this trial; and you are to take it all. I shall consider how much has been added to it by the defence, by and bye. Four months have now elapsed, and neither time, place, mode of death, nor any other circumstance, has directed attention to anv third person ; nobody else is suspected. It is idle, it is absurd, to suppose, in a state of evidence like this, that anv one else committed the act which all that evidence tends to fix and fasten upon this prisoner. There is a further suggestion- and Iwill answer it now-that the remains were carried to the Medical College with a view to get the reward. Did ever a reasonable man listen to, or did ever wise men, who were tittering their own convictions- [Judge Merrick here interposes, and holds a private consultation with the Attorney General.] Mr. Clifford. I understand, may it please your Honors, and Gentlemen, from my learned friend-to whose argument, to whose efforts, I am certainly disposed to do entire justice that be used the matter of the reward in connection only, with this consideration: that it might be remarkable that the offering of the reward was coincident with Mr. Littlefield's commencing the search for these remains. The fact is not so; but, if it were so, what an absurdity it would be, con- necting it with anybody ! That a person should deposit there. and