Dr. James W. Stone. Report of the Trial of
Professor John W. Webster ...
, 1850
,
Image No: 231
   Enlarge and print image (54K)           << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


 

Dr. James W. Stone. Report of the Trial of
Professor John W. Webster ...
, 1850
,
Image No: 231
   Enlarge and print image (54K)           << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
222 patiently till the day of his deliverance should come, in a Court of Jus- tice, by making his explanations and showing his proof. " A victim of prejudice," Gentlemen ? I put it to you, whether that statement has any foundation here. I ask you, whether the very opposite state of things has not existed in a degree unprece- dented in our history; whether there was ever a man against whom the prima facie proofs that had met the public eye had sunk down so deeply into the public heart, who has had such forbearance shown him. There has been, from beginning to end, a degree of reluct- ance that is unprecedented, to admit the possibility of his guilt. Gentlemen, it is a strange and eventful history which we can now look back upon, from the time that these mutilated remains of George Parkman were found in the premises of the defendant, - ay, and under his lock and key. It was the subject of an examin- ation before a Coroner's Jury, which was secret. But, Gentlemen, his Counsel here will do me, as the representative of the Government, the justice to say, or to assent to what I say, that before this evidence which was taken down before the Coroner's Jury had been read by me - before I ever passed my eyes over its pages - it was placed in their hands, for the purpose of enabling them to meet everything that was contained in it, and prepare their client for his defence. It does not, let me say to you, lay in the mouth of this prisoner, or his Counsel, to come here and complain of any course which has been taken, respecting him or his case. Never, I venture to say, was a man put upon his trial for a crime that affected his life, who had received such consideration from the Government representative as he has received from me. I am not aware that there has existed a single fact that has not been fully communicated and freely exhibited to the Counsel for the prisoner, to enable them to investigate, explain, and answer it, that, when they came before a Jury of their country, they might be enabled to say, " ° We have known everything that the Government have to prove; we have prepared our answer; we can explain, and here is the explanation." Gentlemen, so it has stood: and when allusion was made to the fact of his being in that cell friendless and unaided; that there had been a secret inquest, when he was not present ; that there had been afterward a secret investigation by the Grand Jury, where he was not represented,-did it occur to you to reflect, as that statement was made by the Counsel, that between those two investigations there was another occasion, when he was present, when he was represented by the ablest Counsel that the ablest bar in New England could fur- nish him? -that he then,. either with or without their advice, chose, not only to keep his own mouth shut and sealed, but to say to the Government, to say to the world, '° I am content, not only not to offer proof in exculpation of myself, but I am content not to ask even for what proof there is against me "? Gentlemen, between these two in- vestigations, which have been the subject of almost a complaining and reproachful remark, this prisoner was brought into this building, before another triburml, for a prelirninary examination. And, Gentlemen, while there, upon the supposition that he was entirely an innocent man, intelligent as he doubtless is, what, Gentle-