Dr. James W. Stone. Report of the Trial of
Professor John W. Webster ...
, 1850
,
Image No: 130
   Enlarge and print image (48K)           << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


 

Dr. James W. Stone. Report of the Trial of
Professor John W. Webster ...
, 1850
,
Image No: 130
   Enlarge and print image (48K)           << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
121 made with a pen. If the pen had been soaked very soft, it might possibly have been done. [The Counsel makes a heavy mark with the back of a soaked pen, and shows it to the witness.] There is a material difference in the two, because in yours there is lacking that softening shade, and the marks of fibres: It is possible, if there were cotton in the ink, that there might be this appearance. The °° Civis " letter has several peculiarities; one in the termination of a d. Another one is d in the middle of a word. Another is the character (~. I noticed he wrote and in full first, and then after he made one of his own c-'s, and then altered it. There is a general appearance which I can't explain, but it impresses the opinion on my mind that it is Dr. Webster's. The d's in the beginning and end of the words differ. It is undoubtedly a disguised hand, though not to a great degree disguised. I judge from the peculiarity in the separa- tion of the a in the middle of a word. It is separated from the first part, but joined to the last part. This is joined. I think it must have been purposely disguised. I think so from these specimens submitted to me. The most changed letter I could not determine, without sitting down, with a great deal of care. It is like the Doctor's, in some respects, and not like it in others; but there is enough to convince me that he wrote it. I might recall other things, if I were to refer to my memoranda, and have time. [The following anonymous letters were now put in: - Boston, Nov'r 31, '49. Mr Tukey, Dear Sir, I have been considerably interested in the recent affair of Dr Park- man, and I think I can recommend means, the adoption of which might result in bringing to light some of the mysteries connected with the disappearance of the afore-mentioned gentleman. In the first place, with regard to the searching of houses, &c., I would recommend that particular attention be paid to the appearance of cellar floors; do they present the appearance of having been recently dug into and covered up again; or might iiot the part of the cellar where he was buried have been covered by the piling of wood? Secondly, have the outhouses and necessaries been carefully exam. ined; have they been raked sufficiently ? Probably his body was cut up and placed in a stout bag, containing heavy weights, & thrown off one of the bridges,--perhaps Craigie's. And I would recommend the firing of cannon from some of these bridges, and from various parts of the harbor & river, in order to cause the parts of the body to rise to.the surface of the water. This, I think, will be the last resort, & it should be done effectually. And I iecommend that the cellars of the houses in East Cam- bridge be examined. Yours respectfully, CIVIS. [The following one is the letter post-marked November 26, directed to Francis Tukey, City Marshal. The envelope also contained the name on the inside, which was still legible, through an erasure.