Hall account of Webster case, 1850,
Image No: 24
   Enlarge and print image (44K)           << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


 

Hall account of Webster case, 1850,
Image No: 24
   Enlarge and print image (44K)           << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
vard Professor ; when any servant-girl patron of circulating libraries would have told him that Dr. Dodd was a forger. . And the presiding Judge saw in the analogy of false teeth, to the peculiar person of Dr...Parkman; the fine process of Cuivier's Com- parative Anatomy. " Dr. Keep's evidence," says his Honor, " is of the sam6 nature with that which is applied to fossil remains, by means of which a single bone is made to lead to the discovery of an entire animal of an extinct species." You may discover by the bones of an ox that it was once part of an ox, but will the bones help us to a discovery of how fat was the ox, and whether it was brindle or brown ? You may discover by bones that they once be- longed to humanity; but can you tell, in addition, that the man who owned them was black or white, fat or lean, a man of genius or an idiot ? In approaching the conclusion of this brief and hurriedly-pre- pared pamphlet, we add, lest its purport be mistaken, that as wri- ter we have no bias one way or the other toward Professor Web- ater, and individually little in his favor. We have had in main view a solemn belief in which three-fourths of the American people out- side Boston undoubtedly concur, that whether the convicted gen- tleman be guilty or innocent, HE OUGHT NOT To HAVE BEEN FOUND GUILTY ON THE CASE PRESENTED I A case entirely analogous can no where be found. It is sui gen- eris. Aid we hope its records, in its present shape, may never stain the annals of criminal precedent, ai an authority and bea- con-light. We do not quarrel with circumstantial evidence, nor impugn its legitimate force. P is one of the sheet-anchors of jurisprudence; yet when it grapples, let it find but one hypothesis to hold on by, and let that be the inevitable conclusion of the guilt of the prisoner on trial: There is one very old case which may be acceptable to the un- professional reader, and we subjoin it. A case very like Profes- sor Webster's in its trial, where the prisoner made his appeal, and the Judge dictated to the jury. The circumstances were strong against him, and yet, as afterward appeared, the murderer was fore- man of the jury. Let the people of Boston take heed lest a promi- nent actor in their tragedy be not some day discovered guilty, and so bring them into greater reproach, if indeed that be possible in the matter. " In the reign of Queen Elizabeth, a person was arraigned before Sir James Dyer, Lord Chief Justice of the Court of Common Pleas, upon