Bemis Report of the Webster Trial, 1850 [1897], Image No: 257   Enlarge and print image (70K)           << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


 

Bemis Report of the Webster Trial, 1850 [1897], Image No: 257   Enlarge and print image (70K)           << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
TRIAL OF JOHN W. WEBSTER. 254 crime, as there was concealment, connected with these remains. These suppositions were not pressed by the other side; they were thrown out as suggestions,-consistent, or inconsistent, as they might be with other propositions; and the inconsistencies of some of these I shall advert to presently. But they were not dwelt upon, and counsel could not have attached any serious importance to them. No, Gentlemen. The circum- stances under which those remains were found, bring us conclusively to the conviction, that crime was committed with the destruction of Dr. Parkman's life, by whomsoever it was done. I come now, Gentlemen of the Jury, to examine the hypotheses which have been set up on behalf of this defendant. I shall first ask you to consider whether any one of them, taken alone, independent of the rest, is a reasonable hypothesis, such as the law contemplates, to negative the hypothesis which the Government asserts and undertakes to maintain upon circumstantial evidence. I shall then briefly ask you to consider how consistent with each other these hypotheses are: I think I cannot be mistaken, in supposing that the consumption of your time upon this latter subject will be superfluous. For, although the argument which embraced those theories and propositions was addressed to you in the most impressive language and manner, and although each independent and distinctive proposition came from my learned friend with a force and fervency which I could not hope to rival, if I had the ambition to do so, still, I think, as fair-minded men, men of fair intelligence, you could not but have been struck with the manifest contradictions and inconsistencies into which his case had betrayed him. And yet there was no help for it. He did all that mortal man could do. He had the truth of the case against him. And I do not know that an argument could have been framed that would have been more satisfac- tory-certainly none more able and impressive-than he addressed to you out of the materials at his command. But what were the propositions? First, that Dr. Webster admitted,- what we had proved,-that Dr. Parkman went to that College, at or about half-past one o'clock; that he paid Dr Parkman the money, which we say the proof denies; and that Dr. Parkman then departed, and he saw him no more. Upon these the counsel undertake to construct their hypotheses. And what are they? In the first and most important place, they disclaim, now that our proof is .in and uncontrollable, all imputation upon Mr. Littlefield as hav- ing been the author of Dr. Parkman's death. If this had not been done in express words, you, as a jury, would have been bound to put your impress upon that hypothetical statement of what Mr. Littlefield did, or might have done. That statement was made, as the counsel told you, in the fearless discharge of his duty. It may be that it was in the dis- charge of a duty that he put Mr. Littlefield, an honest man, upon his trial here; yet he did not dare to make the accusation against him which his client had had the hardihood to make before he came here. The counsel knew, that, where we had corroborated Mr. Littlefield, he would stand unshaken, and that we had furnished them with the means of contradicting him if his statements were untrue; and they did not contradict him in a single syllable. I mean to present Mr. Littlefield just as he is. I mean that justice shall be done to him, if justice is not done to him who libelled him. But I now speak of this as a part of the counsel's allegations, that he disclaimed all imputation upon Mr. Little- field as having been the perpetrator of this crime. The counsel then argues,-Supposing this to be the body of Dr. Park- man, it is not proved he died by violence; he might have died a. natural death, and been stripped and robbed, and his body carried into the labora- tory of Dr. Webster without his knowledge. I have already had occasion to say to you, we are not here to discuss possibilities. It is no part of your duty, though it may be a part of the duty of the counsel. He could suggest nothing else. Why, Gentlemen 1~