Bemis Report of the Webster Trial, 1850 [1897], Image No: 234   Enlarge and print image (70K)           << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


 

Bemis Report of the Webster Trial, 1850 [1897], Image No: 234   Enlarge and print image (70K)           << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
234 TRIAL OF JOHN W. WEBSTER. day to convey the information to the family of Dr. Parkman; but he was persuaded by his wife to postpone it until after the religious ser- vices of the morning in the College Chapel. Soon after dinner, he went into the city, and met, first, Mr. Blake, the nephew, and afterwards Dr. Francis Parkman, the brother of George Parkman, and informed them that he was the person with whom the appointment was made; and he stated also the fact of the meeting between them, and all that had trans- pired at it. Yet even these communications, so unlikely to have been made at all if he was guilty, and so perfectly natural if he was unconscious of any crime which could be imputed to him, are thought by the Govern- ment to furnish considerations which may be turned against him. Mr. Blake represents, that, in relating the circumstances of the interview, Dr. Webster exhibited in the earnestness of his manner some visible agitation. On the other hand, Dr. Francis Parkman tells you, that he could not but notice the want of sympathy and the formal business-like manner which accompanied the communication. To the one whom he held by the hand as he rapidly adverted to the several incidents of the interview, he seemed too warm; to the other, oppressed by the afflic- tion he was suffering, and surely not in the best state of mind for cool observation himself, he appeared too cold and distant and formal. And each of these opposite objections is urged with equal confidence against him, as if they were portentous signs of guilt; and, conflicting as they are, there is some danger of their injurious influence, unless that danger be averted by your calm and deliberate reflections. It is difficult, if it be not impossible, to judge what would be the manner or deportment of an individual in such a situation. 'His appear- ance would probably seem to vary even if it were substantially the same according to the circumstances and conditions of the mind of the party addressed. Still there may have been on these two occasions some difference in his deportment. Casually meeting Mr. Blake in the street, the communication would be, not unnaturally, with less of ceremony and more of despatch than would occur in the full and detailed statement to Dr. Francis Parkman at his house in the presence of his family. He told the story to each of the parties, in the situation in which he found them, as well as he could. And I submit, that no prejudice should be created against him by their representations of his personal appearance; a prejudice which would unjustly overcome all the advantages to which he is fairly entitled, arising from his prompt and voluntary communica- tion of facts, of which he had ample assurance that no other person than himself had the slightest knowledge. While it is obviously most improbable that he would have made any communication at all, if he bad secretly taken the life of Dr. Parkman, it is on the other hand perfectly natural, that he should have availed himself of this early opportunity to relate the circumstances, if the incidents stated by him to have occurred at their meeting actually took place. He would also naturally go further; he would early look after his own interest in those particulars which, from his narrative, it is apparent would have required his attention. Accordingly, if you go with him as he returned from Boston on Sunday evening, you will find that he called upon the City Clerk in Cambridgeport to see if Dr. Park- man had been there to discharge the mortgage which he had agreed to cancel. All, however, that he could do was to make the inquiry; and, having done so, he could only return to his family. There he was met soon after by Mr. Thompson and Mr. Fuller, with whom he conversed at some length, and with perfect freedom, in relation to the events of the preceding Friday, and of the mortgage which Dr. Parkman had promised to have discharged. If in this interview, Mr. Fuller, the police- man,-belonging to a class of men, whose occupation makes them pro- verbally too susceptible of jealous suspicions,-thinks he saw tokens of agitation in the manner of an individual to whom he was a perfect