Bemis Report of the Webster Trial, 1850 [1897], Image No: 223   Enlarge and print image (72K)           << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


 

Bemis Report of the Webster Trial, 1850 [1897], Image No: 223   Enlarge and print image (72K)           << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
TRIM. OF JOHN W. WEBSTER. 223 Medical College, there is not the slightest remnant or trace of anything but of a naked dead body,-if there is nothing that can indicate the presence of any garment with which it was olothed,-if the sudden aberra- tion of mind of Dr. Parkman is not an unreasonable assumption,-if there are manifest though inexplicable indications that an unknown agent clandestinely visited the apartments assigned to the professor of chemis- try, I submit to you if it be any extravagant or visionary theory which suggests to you, that he wandered away, he knew not where; that he sunk under some of those sudden visitations which terminate human life, or fell into the violent hands of bold bad men, who deprived him of it; and that, when all was over, his property was plundered, and his naked dead body conveyed within the walls of the College, and secretly concealed where its parts were found. You are the judges; and, upon all these facts and circumstances and probabilities, your judgment is seriously and solemnly to be passed. They cannot be disguised from your observation; they cannot be discarded from your reflections. And if they constitute the basis of a reasonable hypothesis,-and if the circumstantial evidence of the prosecution does not, to a moral certainty, exclude you from its adoption, then though it may not wholly satisfy your minds,-- though it may not entirely relieve the prisoner at the bar from the painful suspicions which untoward circumstances have excited, it will still be sufficient to create a reasonable doubt, and, under the laws of the land, at least secure him from a verdict of conviction. I must now ask your attention to a portion of the evidence of the Government which has been thought, and rightly thought, to be not of conclusive, but of serious and material importance. I allude to the testimony of Ephraim L ittlefield. I regret that my duty compels me to enter upon an investigation of the credibility of this witness, and of the consequences which are to be deduced from his testimony, because I am not insensible that the tendency of such an examination is even more than to point a suspicion towards him as the perpetrator of that crime which is charged against the prisoner at the bar. But you must not misunderstand me. I do not assume to impute any homicide to him. I will take upon myself no such fearful responsibility in upholding the defence which now rests upon me as that. I leave that responsibility with the officers of the Government to whom it belongs. But it is my duty to examine, and it is yours tp weigh the testimony of this witness; and if there be anything which tends to disparage it,-anything which is sufficient to crush it, yon are bound to give the uttermost effect to those considerations, whatever may be the consequences. The importance to the Government of the testimony of Mr. Little- field, I do not misapprehend or deny; nor do I fail to appreciate the difficulties it imposes upon the defence. Its general tendency is to show, that Dr. Webster had the sole and exclusive possession of the apart- ments occupied by him in the Medical College: that he effectually secured them against the access of all persons from without; that his agency in everything pertaining to the remains discovered within and beneath the laboratory was direct and constant: and thereby to diminish the prob- ability and reasonableness of that hypothesis of the defence which sug- gests the intervention of an unknown agent to whom everything in relation to those remains may be attributed. You are to consider and determine what weight shall be given to the testimony of Mr. Littlefield, and what abatement shall be made from it. He is in some unimportant particulars' corroborated by others. Mr. Sawin, the express-man from Cambridge, testifies that previous to the ?6th of November, though he had often carried things from Cambridge to Boston for Dr. Webster, he never found the rooms so fastened that he could not enter them. Upon that occasion, he says, that Dr. Webster told him to leave the articles he carried, in the entry, and that he would take them in. When he carried them there, however, he tried the door of the laboratory, and found it locked; and that be looked for the key,