Bemis Report of the Webster Trial, 1850 [1897], Image No: 213   Enlarge and print image (69K)           << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


 

Bemis Report of the Webster Trial, 1850 [1897], Image No: 213   Enlarge and print image (69K)           << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
TRIAL OF JOHN W. WEBSTER. 213 argument would be strong, if the fact of his authorship were established beyond all reasonable doubt. It would be difficult to assign an adequate reason why, if an innocent man, he should have sent such anonymous communications, in a disguised writing, to the head of the police of the city. But the fact itself is first to be proved; and that is absolutely denied by the prisoner. I mean to deny it in terms the most decisive and per- emptory. I regret that these letters came so recently as they did into our possession,-so recently that we have had little opportunity to make a critical examination of them in comparison with specimens admitted to be the genuine handwriting of the prisoner, or to go abroad and find witnesses to whom we could submit them for a proper and thorough scrutiny. They were brought in, as you know, at the very close of the Government's evidence. We were then, and have been ever since, too much pressed with our engagements, the constant urgncy of which you can easily appreciate, to devote the time we could have desired to this particular investigation. Yet I think I have seen them enough to enable me to convince you that they were never written by Dr. Webster. The only evidence that these letters are in his handwriting consists of the opinions of the experts, Mr. Gould, the teacher, and Mr. Smith, the engraver. They have, indeed, often seen his signatures to the medical diplomas of the students at the College; but it is obvious, that their opinions are chiefly to be relied on, only as they may be supposed to be persons possessing peculiar skill and ability in reference to the general subject of handwriting. Mr. Gould believes that all the letters were written by Dr. Webster; but Mr. Smith sustains him only in rela- tion to that, signed "Civis." Mr. Gould stated the reasons upon which his opinion was formed. He sees certain resemblances in some instances, and exact correspond- ence and similarity in others, in certain letters and words which are contained in the anonymous letters, upon comparing them with certain specimens of the admitted handwriting of Dr. Webster which he pro- duced. All these papers are now before you. I have had but little time to examine them, and I claim no skill as an expert. And yet I can easily discover that the supposed resemblances and similarity are merely fanci- ful and imaginary; and I feel sure, that, if you shall take pains to subject all the writings to a careful and critical scrutiny, you will believe that Mr. Gould is too much of a visionary to be relied upon by a jury. This examination you will have all necessary opportunity of making, when you retire for the purpose of deliberation. You are not to be governed or controlled by the opinion of experts. It is but evidence to be consid- ered in connection with the much more important information you can obtain for yourselves, by your own comparison of the papers, which will be put into your possession. I will point out but a single instance; it will serve as a specimen for all the rest. Mr. Gould designates the figures 1, 3, 4, and 9, in the "Civis" letter as corresponding in peculiar- ity of form and construction with the same figures in the acknowledged specimens of genuine writing. Now, if you will for a moment look at the figure "9" in the letter, and compare it with the.same figure in some twenty or thirty of the bank checks, you will find it as different in struc- ture formation, character, and appearance, as two different writers could easily make it. Taking the statements of both the witnesses and all the opinions they have given, no one would pretend to say, that there was any pre- tence for assuming that Dr. Webster wrote either of these, except the one signed "Civis." And believing, as I do most confidently, that that was not written by him I have only to commend it to your careful scrutiny in comparison with the genuine writing. I need not dilate upon this subject. The Court will inform you, that the opinion of the experts is only evidence for your consideration, and is really, upon such an