clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
1986 Report of the State Tax Commissioner
Volume 434, Page 10   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

(10) conservation property owned by the Nature Conservancy, the Chesapeake Bay Foun-
dation, the Izaak Walton League and Maryland Ornithological Society; (11) property of
nonprofit community water systems; and (12) nonprofit housing property.

Table XV itemizes exempt property according to the amount of assessable base in each
subdivision. The total amount of exempt assessable base is $10,497,837,078 which equates
to a full cash value of $24,146,836,292. It should be noted that more than three-quarters
of the total amount of exempt property is owned by the Federal, the State and local
governments.

RATIO STUDY

Assessment ratio studies serve many useful purposes. First, they monitor assessment
performance by indicating the level of assessment and the degree of dispersion around
that level. Second, they indicate the priority of need for reassessment. Third, assessment
ratio studies are used in the estimation of the total market value of all real property in
a political subdivision.

Ratio studies have been conducted in Maryland since the early 1950's and since 1970
have been made annually in accordance with Title 2-202 of the Tax-Property Article. In
1953, the State Tax Commission directed a group of assessors to visit each jurisdiction
in the State and to investigate the level of assessments in each. That study consisted of
random selection and examination of usable sales and from that information the calcula-
tion of a ratio. The survey indicated individual assessment ratios from a high of 60% to
a low of 25 %, with the statewide average being 40 %. The averages were a simple arith-
metic calculation not weighted by dollar value of assessment and sale, nor amounts of
property by use classes.

In 1958, a subcommittee of the Legislature recommended that a similar survey of as-
sessment ratios be conducted in 1959, and that recommendation was adopted. A study
was made on a more comprehensive and detailed basis and the results showed the im-
provements in statewide uniformity. After that survey, the Legislative Council on Taxa-
tion and Fiscal Matters included in its report the language that "As a practical matter exact
uniformity of assessment ratios among the 24 political subdivisions never has been
achieved...; but on the other hand, there is every reason to believe that the assessment
ratios of Baltimore City and the counties can be brought within a range of a few percent-
age points and held there." In 1961, legislation was enacted directing similar surveys be-
ginning in 1962 and to be at two-year intervals thereafter. The law was again changed
in 1970 to require a survey to be made each year.

The general character of assessment uniformity is represented by ratios as shown in
Table IV for the period 1972 through 1986, with the ratios being converted to full value
to reflect changes in the inflationary factors which were implemented in various years.
The method used in valuing property for assessment purposes is based upon historical
data; that is, costs of construction which have been collected from the various subdivi-
sions of the State, and sales of properties which have taken place since the previous as-
sessment became official. It is important to note that in an inflationary period, assessments
which are made correctly at a given level of value (43.4570%) will no longer reflect that
same ratio when those assessments are utilized to generate tax bills at the beginning of
the next taxable year. The Department believes that the uniformity of assessments through-
out the State is its primary responsibility, and that the level of assessments must remain
a secondary consideration.

10

 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
1986 Report of the State Tax Commissioner
Volume 434, Page 10   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives