Volume 211, Page 1709 View pdf image (33K) |
466 JOURNAL OF PROCEEDINGS [Feb. 24,. Mr. Henkle submitted the following amendment:
AMENDMENT PROPOSED.
The question recurring upon the adoption of the amend- It was rejected.
Mr. Henkle submitted the following amendment ;
Section 9, line 10, strike out the words "the sum so agreed
The bill was then read a second time and ordered to be en -
On motion of Mr. Sudler, (the rules being suspended,)
Said bill being upon a third reading, said bill was then AFFIRMATIVE. Messrs. Hines, Speaker, Miller, Greenfield, Bond, Lamar, McColgan, Robinson, Nicodemus, Joyce, Nutwell, Annan, Groh, Bird, Grafton, Fenton, Hawkins, Lee, Berry, Keech, McCosker, Freaner, Merryman, T, H. Hamilton, Grimes, Sudler, Cooper, Stake, Coulbourn, G. R. Hamilton, Clark, Duer, McWilliams, Fletchall, Gordy, Foster, Wier, Hodson, Stay lor, Wack, Turner, of Cecil, Stewart, of B. city, Park, Etchison, McAleese, Vanderford, Latchford, Gill, Leonard, Thompson, Hart, Bedsworth,
Kemp, Loane, Glotfelty—55, NEGATIVE—None.
Said bill was then returned to the Senate.
|
||||
Volume 211, Page 1709 View pdf image (33K) |
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.