clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Meetings of Presidential Electors in Maryland, 1789-1980 1785-1791
Volume 207, Preface 9   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF
THE POLITICAL PARTY SYSTEM
Congress decided, in 1787, that a constitutional convention was needed to consider
amendments to the Articles of Confederation which constituted the basic charter of our gov-
ernment. The convention began its deliberations in May of that year. The first order of busi-
ness, after adopting the rules of procedure was to receive recommendations for an entirely
new framework of government.
Various plans were considered such as the Virginia Plan, submitted by Edmund Ran-
dolph and the New Jersey Plan, sponsored by William Paterson. These, and other plans were
adopted, amended, rejected and studied for several months, until, on September 6, a final
decision was reached to have the President selected by electors chosen by the state legisla-
tures. The Constitution was sent to the states for ratification on September 17,1787; the first
electoral college met on February 4, 1789, to cast ballots for the President and Vice President
of the United States.
The framers of the electoral college system believed that this method would bring the
election close to the people and would be free of pressures to tamper with or corrupt the
vote. It was specified that all electors would meet on the same day in their states to vote for
President and for Vice President, respectively, in the manner prescribed by the Constitution;
to sign six certificates of all the votes cast; to seal the certificates and certify upon each that
the lists and votes were contained therein; and, to dispose of the certificates in the following
manner:
one copy to the President of the Senate of the United States,
two copies to the Secretary of State in the State where the electors were chosen,
two copies to the Administrator of General Services of the United States,
one copy to the Chief Judge of the United States District Court in the jurisdiction where
the electors assemble.
When these duties are completed the responsibility of the electors and the state officials
is fulfilled.
The final ceremonial act of electing the President and the Vice President of the United
States takes place in January. The federal code instructs Congress to be in session in the
House of Representatives where tellers receive and tally the certificates in the alphabetical
order of the States. The results are then delivered to the President of the Senate who
announces the votes and enters the results in the journals of the two Houses. The President
and Vice President of the United States are then officially elected.
It is interesting to note that the Maryland Constitution of 1776, established the Mary-
land Electoral College for the purpose of electing state senators; this system was in use until
1836. Senators were chosen by forty electors, selected by the voters of the county in which
they lived. Two electors were selected from each County with the exception of the Cities of
Annapolis and Baltimore, entitled to one each.
According to students of Maryland's history, it is reasonable to believe that the electoral
college plan finally adopted by the Founding Fathers was patterned, at least in part, after the
Maryland system of electing state senators. Having been in operation for eleven years at the
time of the Federal Constitutional Convention in 1787, the delegates to those deliberations
had an impressive structure to study and use as a model.
McMahan, in "Historical Review of the Government of Maryland" quotes Alexander
Hamilton's reference to Maryland's system of electing state senators: "If the federal Senate,
therefore, really contained the danger which has been so loudly proclaimed, some symptoms
at least of a like danger ought by this time to have been betrayed by the Senate of Maryland;
but no such symptoms have appeared. On the contrary, the jealousies at first entertained by
men of the same description with those who view with terror the correspondent part of the
-ix-

 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Meetings of Presidential Electors in Maryland, 1789-1980 1785-1791
Volume 207, Preface 9   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives