clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 4, Page 161   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

GOODWIN VS. CATON. 161
THE CHANCELLOR:
It must be assumed in this case, that the title of John Warms-
ley was transferred to Richard Goodwin, it appearing from an
examination of the debt books that the quit rents were paid by
the latter from the year 1755 to 1775, and the evidence show-
ing that Goodwin, and those claiming under him, held possession
of the property for upwards of fifty years.
It is said by the counsel for the caveatee that the recital in
the escheat warrant of the death, without heirs, of John Warms-
ley and John Goodwin, is prima facie evidence in favor of the
state's title, and the case of Lee vs. Hoye, 1 Gill, 200, is re-
ferred to in support of the position. The case cited, by no
means establishes the position, though it does prove that where
a certificate has been regularly returned upon an escheat war-
rant, which has remained long enough in the land office without
caveat to justify the emanation of a grant, a reasonable prima
facie presumption arises that the land is escheatable. In this
case the certificate was returned on the 10th of July, 1845, and
was caveated the same day. To allow the mere recital in the
warrant to raise the presumption contended for, would be to
permit parties Interested to fabricate evidence for themselves
in opposition to the general rule which forbids it. The Court
of Appeals evidently put the matter upon a different ground,
making the presumption rest upon the acquiescence of the pub-
lic, that acquiescence being shown by the omission to object to
the patent for the required period after the certificate has been
returned to the office.
In the case of Casey's Lessee vs. Inloes et al, 1 Gill, 434 and
510, the Court of Appeals say an escheat grant is prima facie
evidence that the land granted is liable to escheat, but I am
satisfied, that no case can be found in which it has been decided,
or even intimated, that the mere recital in the warrant, which
is the act of the party himself unsupported by any concurring
circumstances, has been considered as raising any presumption
that the land is liable to escheat, so as to throw the burden of
proving the contrary upon the party who resists the patent.
There is in this case, then, no prima facie evidence ill favor

 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 4, Page 161   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives