Volume 102, Page 639 View pdf image (33K) |
639 Audoun, Ecker, Negley, Baker, Farrow, Russell, Barron, Hatch, Schley, Brooks, Hebb, Stockbridge, Carter, Keefer, Wickard, Cunningham, Kennard, Wooden—26.
So the question upon its adoption was decided in the
The question then recurring upon the motion submitted It was decided in the affirmative.
Mr. Hollyday moved to amend the report by striking out
The question being on the adoption of the amendment,
The yeas and nays were called, and appeared as follows: Messrs. Galloway, Parran, Groldsb6rough, Pt. Greene. Pugh, Belt, Hoffman, Purnell, Billingsley, Hollyday, Ridgely, Blackiston, Hopkins, Sands, Bond, Hopper, Scott, Briscoe, Horsey, Smith, of Carroll, Carter, Kennard, Smith, of Wor., Chambers, King, Stirling, Clarke, Larsh, Swope, Daniel, Lee, Sykes, Dellinger, Markey, Thomas, Dent, Miller, Todd, Duvall, Mullikin, Turner, Earle, Nyman, Wooden—46. Ecker, Parker, NEGATIVE. Messrs. Cushing, Murray, Abbott, Davis, of Wash. Negley, Annan, Farrow, Russell, Audoun, Hebb, Schley, Baker, Keefer, Stockbridge, Barron, Mayhugh, Wickard—19.
Cunningham, McComas,
|
||||
Volume 102, Page 639 View pdf image (33K) |
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.