Volume 102, Page 441 View pdf image (33K) |
441
The yeas and nays were called, and appeared as follows: Messrs. Hoffman, Nyman, Goldsborough, P't Hollyday, Parran, Bond, Hopkins, Purnell, Brown, Keefer, Ridgely, Cushing, Kennard, Robinette, _ Daniel, Lee, Sands, Davis, of Wash., Markey, Stirling, Dellinger, Mayhugh, Stockbridge, Earle, . Mitchell, Swope, Edelen, Miller, Wooden—31. Greene, Mullikin, NEGATIVE. Messrs. Galloway, Parker, Abbott, Harwood, Pugh, Annan, Hebb, Russell, Baker, Hopper, Schley, Cunningham, King, Scott, Ecker, McComas, Smith, of Wor., Farrow, Murray, Todd—20.
So the question upon its adoption was decided in the Mr. Sands submitted the following amendment: Strike out section 4; Decided in the affirmative. Mr. Stirling submitted the following amendment:
Amend section 5 by striking out from the word "become" Decided in the affirmative. Mr. Miller submitted the following amendment: Sec. 5, strike out all after the word "year" in the fifth line. The question being on the adoption of the amendment,
Mr. Miller demanded the yeas and nays; |
||||
Volume 102, Page 441 View pdf image (33K) |
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.