clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Proceedings and Debates of the 1850 Constitutional Convention
Volume 101, Page 400   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

400

Mr. John Newcomer, presented a petition of sundry citizens of
Washington county, praying that provision may be made in the
new constitution, that the privilege to sell intoxicating liquor shall
not be granted to any person in any part of the State, except the
same shall first be sanctioned or approved by a majority of the
votes in the election district where the saitie is to be sold

Which was read, and

Referred to the select committee appointed on that subject.

On motion of Mr. Smith, it was
Ordered, That the committee on Printing, be directed to have
printed for the use of the convention, in one tabular form, the
various plans for a basis of representation of the House of Dele
gates.

Mr. Brent,of Balt, city, moved the Convention reconsider their
vote of yesterday, upon the resolution adopted in relation to dis
pensiug with the services of certain committee clerks.

Mr. McHenry, moved to lay the motion on the table

Mr. Brent, of Balt. city, moved the question be taken by yeas
and nays, and being ordered, appeared as follows:

AFFIRMATIVE—Messrs. Lee, Chambers, of Kent, Donaldson,
Dorsey, Randall, Sellman, Buchanan, Welch, McLane, Fooks,
Shriver, Biser, McHenry, Nelson, Schley, Fiery, Neill, John
Newcomer, Harbine, Brewer, Weber, Slicer, Smith, Parke,
Shower, Cockey and Brown —27.
NEGATIVE—Messrs. Blakistone, Prest. p. t., Dent, Hopewell,
Wells, Dalrymple, Jenifer, Ridgely, Dickinson, Sherwood, of
Talbot, Crisfield, Dashiell, Williams, Hicks, Hodson, Eccieston,
Phelps, Bowie, Tuck, Sprigg, Bowling, Grason, Wright, Dirick
son, McMaster, Gwinn, Brent, of Balt. city, Sherwood, of Balt.
city, Presstman, Ware, Davis and Waters—31.

So the Convention refused to lay the motion on the table.

The question then recurred on the motion of Mr. Brent, of
Balt. city, to reconsider

Mr. Buchanan, moved the previous question, and being second
ed,

The question was put,
"Will the Convention reconsider their vote on said resolution?"
Mr. Buchanan, moved the question be taken by yeas and nays,
and being ordered, appeared as follows

AFFIRMATIVE—Messrs. Blakistone, Prest, p. t., Dent, Hope.
well, Wells, Dalrymple, Jenifer, Dickinson, Dashiell, Williams,
Hicks, Hodson, Eceleston, Phelps, Bowie, Tuck, Sprigg, Bowl
ing, Dirickson, McMAster, Gwinn, Brent. of Balt. city, Sherwood
of Balt. city, Presstman, Ware, Davis, Kilgour and Waters---27.
NEGATIVE—Messrs. Lee, Chambers of Kent, Donaldson, Dor
sey, Sellman, Buchanan, Welch, Ridgely, Sherwood of Talbot,


 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Proceedings and Debates of the 1850 Constitutional Convention
Volume 101, Page 400   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives