Volume 67, Page 324 View pdf image (33K) |
324 Provincial Court Proceedings, 1677/8. Liber N N pounds of good sound well condiconed Mrchantable tobacco & cask in some convenient place upon the Clifts aforesaid att or before the fifteenth day of May next ensueing the date hereof Or if the said Morgan Jones his heyres Exrs Admrs or assignes shall or doe att or before the said fifteenth day of May next ensueing the date hereof giue such sufficient security for the paymt of the said sume of two p. 560 thousand seven hundred forty & eight Pounds of tobacco with cask upon the tenth day of Octobr then next following And if the said Morgan Jones his Exrs Admrs or assignes shall happen to make de fault in paymt of the said sume of two thousand seven hundred forty & eight pounds of tobacco or give security for the paymt of the same as aforesaid That then and imediatly after such default made the said Morgan Jones shall become Servant to the said Wm Kent his heyres Exrs Admts & assignes for the terme of two whole yeares without fraud or further delay That then this prsent Obligacon shall be void & of none effect, otherwise to stand & remaine in full force strength & vertue. Which being read & heard, the said Morgan Jones by the said Attorney prayed liberty to imparle hereunto untill next Court & itt is granted unto him, the same day is given to the plaintiffe also Now here att this day to witt the thirteenth day of June in the third yeare of the Dominion of Charles Lord Baltemore &c Annoq3 Doni 1678. came the said parties by their Attorneys aforesaid And the said Morgan Jones by his said Attorney saith that the aforesaid Wm Kent ought not to have his accofl aforesaid agt him because he saith, that he the said Morgan att the tyme of the makeing the write ing aforesaid was imprisoned by the said William that is to say att the Clifts in Calvert County aforesaid & there in prison detained till the said Morgan by force & dures of his imprisonmt the aforesaid writeing obligatory to the aforesaid Wm Kent then & there made, & this he is ready to averr whereupon he demands judgemt whether the said William his action aforesaid agt him ought to have. And the said. Wm Kent saith, that he by anything before alledged ought not to be barred from haveing his action aforesaid, because he saith, that the aforesaid Morgan Jones att the tyme of the make ing of the writeing obligatory aforesaid was att his owne disposall, att large, & the same writeing obligatory of his own meer spantaneous will to the said Wm Kent did make, & not by force as the abovesaid Morgan hath above alleadged, & of this he prayes that it may be enquired into by the Countrey, & the said plaintiffe Defendt likewise Therefore comand is given to the Sheriffe of St Maryes County that he cause to come here twelve &c by whom &c who neither &c to recog nize &c because as well &c And the Jurors impannelled being called likewise came to witt Thomas Stagg, Wm Hemsley, Benjamin Hunt, John Whittington, Edward Cooke, Edmond Dennis, Jno Tennison Tho: Pattison, Richard Keen, Robert Ellys, Edward Turner & Tho: |
||||
Volume 67, Page 324 View pdf image (33K) |
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.