Volume 57, Page 248 View pdf image (33K) |
248 Provincial Court Proceedings, 1667—68. Liber FF Craues judgmt if the Assise between him and the said Gartrud ought to be taken Nottley And the said John and Gartrud say that the said Assise between the said Gartrud and the said John Ought to be taken and say as aforesaid that the said John unjustly and wthout Judgmt did deseize the said Gartrud of the said One hundred acres of land in uiew put and in the plaint specifyed as they haue aboue in their pleas alleadg'd for he saith that the Rigt Honble Caecilins Lord Proprietary did not by his letters pattents Grant the said One hundred acres of land to him the said John Salter in manner and forme as the said John in his plea hath alleadged, And this the said Gartrud requires it may be enquired by the Assise and the said John Woollcott in like manner ther fore let the Assise between them be taken, Morecroft The said John Woollcott for further proofe of his title to the said One hundred acres of land doth produce on the records of this Prouince a speciall warrt undr the hand of the sd Lord Proprietary wherein is granted to Francis Brook the said One hundred acres of land bearing date the fifteen day of January One thousand Six hun- dred fifty one therein expressing it to be heretofore forfeited to his said lordsp by John Gresham for his the said Greshams rebellion to his said lopp by uertue of which speciall Grant the said Francis Brook was thereof possessed in his demesne as of fee, who afterwards con- ueyed the same to the aforesaid Salter as by his Lordps Grant undr the great seale of this Prouince doth more fully and largly appeare Moreouer the said Woollcott doth bring into Court a Copy of the Records from Kent wherein the said land is Confirm'd to the said John Salter as Assignee of the said Francis Brook by an Ordr of Court there made the 20th day of July One Thowsand Six hundred fifty eighte by his löpps Justices of the Prouinciall Court then held att the County Court of Kent aforesaid—which said writeings being heard and read the plt doth further reply thereunto the which he deliuers into Court as followeth [p. 550] And the said John and Gartrud say that the letters pattents in Euidence by the said John Woollcott giuen is not sufficient in law to proue the Grant of the said Rt Honble Caecilius &c: of the land in uiew put and in the plaint menconed to him the said John salter neither that the said John Gresham was euer seized of any such Estate as he could forfeit and this they are ready to auerr And of this he Craueth the Judgmt of the Court if the said Lord Proprietarys Letters Pattents by the said John Woollcott in euidence giuen be suf- ficient in law to proue the same Morecroft Then was taken the Oath of Capt Robt Vaughan who was sumoned by the plt to testify in this Cause and being sworne in open Court saith |
||||
Volume 57, Page 248 View pdf image (33K) |
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.