Volume 53, Page 236 View pdf image (33K) |
236 Charles County Court Proceedings, 1658-1662. Liber A William Robisson Sworne and examined in open Court sayeth con cerning hogstealing that when hee was building a tobacco hows for Mr Baker hee saw him and William Empson bring in flue hogges with the helpe of an indian to helpe them Cary it and after thay wear all in the hows Thomas Baker cald mee unto the Roome whear thay all lay and shewed mee the hogs whearof three wanted Ears and too did not which hee sayd was one of his marke and an other of Mary Empsons and bid mee looke at the doore and thear was hogs of the same markes, which I did but Coold not perceaue any of them agree with the other markes hee Called only my self in though I had an other with mee thear at worke, I did Conceaue them to bee Mis Causeenes hoggs and did speake as much of them as I durst well, becaus I had no other testimonie, and further this deponant saw Mr Baker and Empson Commonly Cary hogs Ears in thear shot bagge and one day one John Martin Coming to Mr Bakers hows Mr Baker shewed him a pare of hogs Ears and sayd looke hear wee are forced to keepe owr hogs Ears owr neighbours doe so much suspect us for hogstealing this deponant declares that euer since hee knew W Baker hee hath had the Common Repuit of A Hogstealler and while this deponant was at worke at Mr Bakers Richard Row was theare with whome Mr Baker woold haue a great deale of Baudie talke and Jeear him with putting his maggat in Popes Wifes flesh to which Roe sayd wee doe not lye all three togeather as you doe then baker Replyed my bows is my owne and my bed is my owne and I may lodge whome I Pleas in it and afterward thay had sum discours about meat and Roe sayd I was nener Counted A hogstealler to which Baker Replyed no thow hast not wit enoug and beeing moued at him Mr [p. 230] Baker told him hee was no Christian and valewed not to kill him if hee met him in the woods, then a Dogge and hauing further discours this Deponant heard Mr Baker say that Popes Wifes Cunt was licke a shot bagge and Mis Hatches Cunt woold make Souse Enough for all the dogges in the Toune and that Mr Batcheler must get a swans necke to put upon the end of his prick or Els bee Coold not get his wife with Child and this deponant further declares that when hee Came from Seauerne fight Comming into Bakers hows thear hee saw nobodie but Mr Baker and Empsons Wife who told him thay knew of a Prise and if hee woold keepe it Secret hee shoold haue Share, and that was that thay knew whear Mr Causeene had hid his goods and thay did Conceaue sume plate amongst it and Mr Baker tould him it was hid a little without the plantation and hee durst not bee seene thear for feare of Mistrust but hee woold shew this de ponant whear it was, so thay went alonge togeather till thay Came near the Plantation to a feud Caled the Queens feud whear Mr Baker hid himself amongst the bushes and bid this deponant fetch the goods but this deponant reflecting upon the basenes of the action Returned to him and told him thay wear gone at which Mr Baker seemed very soryfull and so thay went away and further sayeth not: |
||||
Volume 53, Page 236 View pdf image (33K) |
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|
An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact
mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.